Standard

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. / Kraus, Sascha; Breier, Matthias; Lim, Weng Marc и др.
в: Review of Managerial Science, Том 16, № 8, 01.11.2022, стр. 2577-2595.

Результаты исследований: Вклад в журнал › Статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Kraus, S, Breier, M, Lim, WM, Dabić, M, Kumar, S, Kanbach, D, Mukherjee, D, Corvello, V, Piñeiro-chousa, J, Liguori, E, Palacios-marqués, D, Schiavone, F, Ferraris, A, Fernandes, C & Ferreira, JJ 2022, 'Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice', Review of Managerial Science, Том. 16, № 8, стр. 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

APA

Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

Vancouver

Kraus S, Breier M, Lim WM, Dabić M, Kumar S, Kanbach D и др. Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science. 2022 нояб. 1;16(8):2577-2595. doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

Author

Kraus, Sascha ; Breier, Matthias ; Lim, Weng Marc и др. / Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. в: Review of Managerial Science. 2022 ; Том 16, № 8. стр. 2577-2595.

BibTeX

@article{cea4d55c070d41ac8e4c8e0f276bec74,
title = "Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice",
abstract = "Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Contributions, Literature reviews, Meta Analysis, Methods",
author = "Sascha Kraus and Matthias Breier and Lim, {Weng Marc} and Marina Dabi{\'c} and Satish Kumar and Dominik Kanbach and Debmalya Mukherjee and Vincenzo Corvello and Juan Pi{\~n}eiro-chousa and Eric Liguori and Daniel Palacios-marqu{\'e}s and Francesco Schiavone and Alberto Ferraris and Cristina Fernandes and Ferreira, {Jo{\~a}o J.}",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "2577--2595",
journal = "Review of Managerial Science",
issn = "1863-6683",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

AU - Kraus, Sascha

AU - Breier, Matthias

AU - Lim, Weng Marc

AU - Dabić, Marina

AU - Kumar, Satish

AU - Kanbach, Dominik

AU - Mukherjee, Debmalya

AU - Corvello, Vincenzo

AU - Piñeiro-chousa, Juan

AU - Liguori, Eric

AU - Palacios-marqués, Daniel

AU - Schiavone, Francesco

AU - Ferraris, Alberto

AU - Fernandes, Cristina

AU - Ferreira, João J.

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.

AB - Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Contributions

KW - Literature reviews

KW - Meta Analysis

KW - Methods

UR - https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=tsmetrics&SrcApp=tsm_test&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=000873933300001

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=8YFLogxK&scp=85139218895

U2 - 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

DO - 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 2577

EP - 2595

JO - Review of Managerial Science

JF - Review of Managerial Science

SN - 1863-6683

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 31790812