Standard

Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion. / Kuznetsov, E.; Berland, V. E.; Wiebe, Yu. и др.
в: Cosmic Research, Том 40, № 3, 2002, стр. 305-312.

Результаты исследований: Вклад в журнал › Статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Kuznetsov, E, Berland, VE, Wiebe, Y, Glamazda, D, Kajzer, G, Kolesnikov, VI & Khremli, G 2002, 'Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion', Cosmic Research, Том. 40, № 3, стр. 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015985206275

APA

Kuznetsov, E., Berland, V. E., Wiebe, Y., Glamazda, D., Kajzer, G., Kolesnikov, V. I., & Khremli, G. (2002). Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion. Cosmic Research, 40(3), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015985206275

Vancouver

Kuznetsov E, Berland VE, Wiebe Y, Glamazda D, Kajzer G, Kolesnikov VI и др. Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion. Cosmic Research. 2002;40(3):305-312. doi: 10.1023/A:1015985206275

Author

Kuznetsov, E. ; Berland, V. E. ; Wiebe, Yu. и др. / Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion. в: Cosmic Research. 2002 ; Том 40, № 3. стр. 305-312.

BibTeX

@article{834d5bf525794027aa22888d382c9282,
title = "Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion",
abstract = "This paper continues a comparative analysis of modern satellite models of the Earth's gravity which we started in [6, 7]. In the cited works, the uniform norms of spherical functions were compared with their gradients for individual harmonics of the geopotential expansion [6] and the potential differences were compared with the gravitational accelerations obtained in various models of the Earths gravity [7]. In practice, it is important to know how consistently the EAS motion is represented by various geopotential models. Unless otherwise stated, a model version in which the equations of motion are written using the classical Encke scheme and integrated together with the variation equations by the implicit one-step Everhart's algorithm [1] was used. When calculating coordinates and velocities on the integration step (at given instants of time), the approximate Everhart formula was employed.",
author = "E. Kuznetsov and Berland, {V. E.} and Yu. Wiebe and D. Glamazda and G. Kajzer and Kolesnikov, {V. I.} and G. Khremli",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1023/A:1015985206275",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "305--312",
journal = "Cosmic Research",
issn = "0010-9525",
publisher = "Pleiades Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of models of the Earth's gravity: 3. Accuracy of predicting EAS motion

AU - Kuznetsov, E.

AU - Berland, V. E.

AU - Wiebe, Yu.

AU - Glamazda, D.

AU - Kajzer, G.

AU - Kolesnikov, V. I.

AU - Khremli, G.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper continues a comparative analysis of modern satellite models of the Earth's gravity which we started in [6, 7]. In the cited works, the uniform norms of spherical functions were compared with their gradients for individual harmonics of the geopotential expansion [6] and the potential differences were compared with the gravitational accelerations obtained in various models of the Earths gravity [7]. In practice, it is important to know how consistently the EAS motion is represented by various geopotential models. Unless otherwise stated, a model version in which the equations of motion are written using the classical Encke scheme and integrated together with the variation equations by the implicit one-step Everhart's algorithm [1] was used. When calculating coordinates and velocities on the integration step (at given instants of time), the approximate Everhart formula was employed.

AB - This paper continues a comparative analysis of modern satellite models of the Earth's gravity which we started in [6, 7]. In the cited works, the uniform norms of spherical functions were compared with their gradients for individual harmonics of the geopotential expansion [6] and the potential differences were compared with the gravitational accelerations obtained in various models of the Earths gravity [7]. In practice, it is important to know how consistently the EAS motion is represented by various geopotential models. Unless otherwise stated, a model version in which the equations of motion are written using the classical Encke scheme and integrated together with the variation equations by the implicit one-step Everhart's algorithm [1] was used. When calculating coordinates and velocities on the integration step (at given instants of time), the approximate Everhart formula was employed.

UR - https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=tsmetrics&SrcApp=tsm_test&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=000176484000011

U2 - 10.1023/A:1015985206275

DO - 10.1023/A:1015985206275

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 305

EP - 312

JO - Cosmic Research

JF - Cosmic Research

SN - 0010-9525

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 43090727