Standard

The relative response of Russian National Wealth Fund to oil demand, supply and risk shocks. / Sohag, Kazi; Hassan, M. Kabir; Kalina, Irina et al.
In: Energy Economics, Vol. 123, 106724, 01.07.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sohag K, Hassan MK, Kalina I, Mariev O. The relative response of Russian National Wealth Fund to oil demand, supply and risk shocks. Energy Economics. 2023 Jul 1;123:106724. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106724

Author

BibTeX

@article{66e1984a02504f449aab9f5495e74694,
title = "The relative response of Russian National Wealth Fund to oil demand, supply and risk shocks",
abstract = "The current economic and political environment requires a rapid government response in managing the external and internal effects of economic shocks. Russian economy substantially relies on hydrocarbon revenue, thus the government formed National Wealth Fund (NWF) as a macroprudential instrument to mitigate the adverse effect of the global energy market. To this end, we utilise the Cross-Quantilogram framework to analyse the response of the NWF to Oil Demand, Supply and Risk Shocks ranging from 13 July 2012 until 30 June 2022. To decompose oil market shocks, we follow the new Ready (2018) identification methodology. We also establish the channels of possible responsiveness of NWF to structural oil shocks. Our empirical investigation demonstrates the NWF of Russia is highly anchored with oil market shocks. Specifically, NWF positively responds to Oil Demand Shock at the lower to the median quantiles of demand-side shock and low quantiles of National Wealth Fund. The negative responsiveness of the NWF of Russia to the Oil Supply Shock is profound at the higher quantiles of NWF and the least quantile of a supply shock. Finally, Oil Risk Shock affects negatively to NWF. The robust findings of the study may be used to derive important policy implications for utilising the NWF and regulating Russia's economic stability.",
author = "Kazi Sohag and Hassan, {M. Kabir} and Irina Kalina and Oleg Mariev",
note = "This study was supported by the Ural Federal University (Priority-2030 Program)",
year = "2023",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106724",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
journal = "Energy Economics",
issn = "0140-9883",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative response of Russian National Wealth Fund to oil demand, supply and risk shocks

AU - Sohag, Kazi

AU - Hassan, M. Kabir

AU - Kalina, Irina

AU - Mariev, Oleg

N1 - This study was supported by the Ural Federal University (Priority-2030 Program)

PY - 2023/7/1

Y1 - 2023/7/1

N2 - The current economic and political environment requires a rapid government response in managing the external and internal effects of economic shocks. Russian economy substantially relies on hydrocarbon revenue, thus the government formed National Wealth Fund (NWF) as a macroprudential instrument to mitigate the adverse effect of the global energy market. To this end, we utilise the Cross-Quantilogram framework to analyse the response of the NWF to Oil Demand, Supply and Risk Shocks ranging from 13 July 2012 until 30 June 2022. To decompose oil market shocks, we follow the new Ready (2018) identification methodology. We also establish the channels of possible responsiveness of NWF to structural oil shocks. Our empirical investigation demonstrates the NWF of Russia is highly anchored with oil market shocks. Specifically, NWF positively responds to Oil Demand Shock at the lower to the median quantiles of demand-side shock and low quantiles of National Wealth Fund. The negative responsiveness of the NWF of Russia to the Oil Supply Shock is profound at the higher quantiles of NWF and the least quantile of a supply shock. Finally, Oil Risk Shock affects negatively to NWF. The robust findings of the study may be used to derive important policy implications for utilising the NWF and regulating Russia's economic stability.

AB - The current economic and political environment requires a rapid government response in managing the external and internal effects of economic shocks. Russian economy substantially relies on hydrocarbon revenue, thus the government formed National Wealth Fund (NWF) as a macroprudential instrument to mitigate the adverse effect of the global energy market. To this end, we utilise the Cross-Quantilogram framework to analyse the response of the NWF to Oil Demand, Supply and Risk Shocks ranging from 13 July 2012 until 30 June 2022. To decompose oil market shocks, we follow the new Ready (2018) identification methodology. We also establish the channels of possible responsiveness of NWF to structural oil shocks. Our empirical investigation demonstrates the NWF of Russia is highly anchored with oil market shocks. Specifically, NWF positively responds to Oil Demand Shock at the lower to the median quantiles of demand-side shock and low quantiles of National Wealth Fund. The negative responsiveness of the NWF of Russia to the Oil Supply Shock is profound at the higher quantiles of NWF and the least quantile of a supply shock. Finally, Oil Risk Shock affects negatively to NWF. The robust findings of the study may be used to derive important policy implications for utilising the NWF and regulating Russia's economic stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=8YFLogxK&scp=85159434371

UR - https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=tsmetrics&SrcApp=tsm_test&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=001008763100001

U2 - 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106724

DO - 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106724

M3 - Article

VL - 123

JO - Energy Economics

JF - Energy Economics

SN - 0140-9883

M1 - 106724

ER -

ID: 39232262