DOI

  • Benjamin Hord
  • Eliza M.-R. Kempton
  • Thomas M. Evans-Soma
  • David W. Latham
  • David R. Ciardi
  • Diana Dragomir
  • Knicole D. Colón
  • Gabrielle Ross
  • Andrew Vanderburg
  • Zoe L. de Beurs
  • Karen A. Collins
  • Cristilyn N. Watkins
  • Jacob Bean
  • Nicolas B. Cowan
  • Tansu Daylan
  • Caroline V. Morley
  • Jegug Ih
  • David Baker
  • Khalid Barkaoui
  • Natalie M. Batalha
  • Aid Behmard
  • Alexander A. Belinski
  • Zouhair Benkhaldoun
  • Paul Benni
  • Krzysztof Bernacki
  • Allyson Bieryla
  • Avraham Binnenfeld
  • Pau Bosch-Cabot
  • François Bouchy
  • Valerio Bozza
  • Rafael Brahm
  • Lars A. Buchhave
  • Michael l Calkins
  • Ashley Chontos
  • Catherine A. Clark
  • Ryan Cloutier
  • Marion Cointepas
  • Kevin I. Collins
  • Dennis M. Conti
  • Ian J. M. Crossfield
  • Fei Dai
  • Jerome Pitogo de Leon
  • Georgina Dransfield
  • Courtney Dressing
  • Adam Dustor
  • Gilbert A. Esquerdo
  • Phil Evans
  • Sergio B. Fajardo-Acosta
  • Jerzy Fiołka
  • Raquel Forés-Toribio
  • Antonio Frasca
  • Akihiko Fukui
  • Benjamin Fulton
  • Elise Furlan
  • Tianjun Gan
  • Davide Gandolfi
  • Mourad Ghachoui
  • Steven Giacalone
  • Emily A. Gilbert
  • Michael Gillon
  • Eric Girardin
  • Erica Gonzales
  • Ferran Grau Horta
  • Joao Gregorio
  • Michael Greklek-McKeon
  • Pere Guerra
  • J. D. Hartman
  • Coel Hellier
  • Ian Helm
  • Krzysztof G. Hełminiak
  • Thomas Henning
  • Michelle L. Hill
  • Keith Horne
  • Andrew W. Howard
  • Steve B. Howell
  • Daniel Huber
  • Giovanni Isopi
  • Emmanuel Jehin
  • Jon M. Jenkins
  • Eric L. N. Jensen
  • Marshall C. Johnson
  • Andrés Jordán
  • Stephen Kane
  • John F. Kielkopf
  • Sławomir Lasota
  • Elena Lee
  • Pablo Lewin
  • John H. Livingston
  • Jack Lubin
  • Franco Mallia
  • Christopher R. Mann
  • Giuseppi Marino
  • Nataliia Maslennikova
  • Bob Massey
  • Rachel Matson
  • Elisabeth Matthews
  • Andrew W. Mayo
  • Tsevi Mazeh
  • Kim K. McLeod
  • Edward Michaels
  • Teo Močnik
  • Mayuko Mori
  • Georgia Mraz
  • Jose A. Muñoz
  • Norio Narita
  • Krupa Natarajan
  • Louise D. Nielsen
  • Hugh P. Osborn
  • Enric Palle
  • Aviad Panahi
  • Riccardo Papini
  • Peter P. Plavchan
  • Alex S. Polanski
  • Adam Popowicz
  • Francisco J. Pozuelos
  • Samuel N. Quinn
  • Don J. Radford
  • Phillip Reed
  • Howard M. Relles
  • Malena Rice
  • Paul Robertson
  • Joseph Rodriguez
  • Lee J. Rosenthal
  • Ryan A. Rubenzahl
  • Nicole Schanche
  • Joshua E. Schlieder
  • Richard P. Schwarz
  • Ramotholo Sefako
  • Avi Shporer
  • Alessandro Sozzetti
  • Gregor Srdoc
  • Christopher A. Stockdale
  • Alexander Tarasenkov
  • Thiam Guan Tan
  • Mathilde Timmermans
  • Eric Ting
  • Judah Van Zandt
  • J. P. Vignes
  • Ian Waite
  • Noriharu Watanabe
  • Lauren M. Weiss
  • Justin Wittrock
  • George Zhou
  • Carl Ziegler
  • Shay Zucker
JWST has ushered in an era of unprecedented ability to characterize exoplanetary atmospheres. While there are over 5000 confirmed planets, more than 4000 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) planet candidates are still unconfirmed and many of the best planets for atmospheric characterization may remain to be identified. We present a sample of TESS planets and planet candidates that we identify as "best-in-class" for transmission and emission spectroscopy with JWST. These targets are sorted into bins across equilibrium temperature T eq and planetary radius R p and are ranked by a transmission and an emission spectroscopy metric (TSM and ESM, respectively) within each bin. We perform cuts for expected signal size and stellar brightness to remove suboptimal targets for JWST. Of the 194 targets in the resulting sample, 103 are unconfirmed TESS planet candidates, also known as TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs). We perform vetting and statistical validation analyses on these 103 targets to determine which are likely planets and which are likely false positives, incorporating ground-based follow-up from the TESS Follow-up Observation Program to aid the vetting and validation process. We statistically validate 18 TOIs, marginally validate 31 TOIs to varying levels of confidence, deem 29 TOIs likely false positives, and leave the dispositions for four TOIs as inconclusive. Twenty-one of the 103 TOIs were confirmed independently over the course of our analysis. We intend for this work to serve as a community resource and motivate formal confirmation and mass measurements of each validated planet. We encourage more detailed analysis of individual targets by the community.
Язык оригиналаАнглийский
Номер статьи233
ЖурналAstronomical Journal
Том167
Номер выпуска5
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2024

    Предметные области WoS

  • Астрономия и астрофизика

ID: 57318261